February 24, 2004

"Human Corporation" Begins Campaign

"The other party's nomination battle is still playing out. The candidates are an interesting group with diverse opinions -- for tax cuts and against them; for NAFTA and against NAFTA; for the Patriot Act and against the Patriot Act; in favor of liberating Iraq and opposed to it. And that's just one senator from Massachusetts." This was one of the humorous parts of GWB's address to Republican governors tonight, but there were some serious points as well.

"Our opponents say they approve of bold action in the world, but only if no other government disagrees,"he said.

Speaking of his Democratic critics, Bush also said, "They now agree that the world is better off with Saddam [Hussein] out of power. They just didn't support removing Saddam from power. Maybe they were hoping he'd lose the next Iraqi election."

And there's this from the full transcript, available on Fox News but not CNN: "The other party is still not finished selecting its nominee. Yet this much is already certain: Come November, the voters are going to have a very clear choice. It's a choice between keeping the tax relief that is moving the economy forward, or putting the burden of higher taxes back on the American people. It is a choice between an America that leads the world with strength and confidence, or an America that is uncertain in the face of danger. The American people will decide between two visions of government: a government that encourages ownership and opportunity and responsibility, or a government that takes your money and makes your choices."

And all this with only two mentions of NED! Not bad for a man Ralph Nader claims is really a corporation, masquerading as a human being.

Posted by JohnGalt at February 24, 2004 12:44 AM
Comments

Pretty good. If you can deal with calls to NED, I suppose I can deal with his supporting the FMA.

Posted by: jk at February 24, 2004 11:39 AM

I think that Much more disturbing and discouraging than calls to NED or support for the FMA are W's current spending policies. Medicare drugs? Faith-based charities? AIDS relief in Africa?

The democrats wish to tax and spend. W wishes to not-tax and still spend.

Someone get this man an accountant! Smaller George, we want the government to be smaller.

Posted by: dagny at February 24, 2004 01:36 PM

I'm with you Dagny, but that is not what W is. I was warned by some Texan friends in the 2000 campaign that he was not a small government conservative. They were right but I am not leaving the reservation. W in '04!

Posted by: jk at February 24, 2004 03:06 PM

Atta boy, JK! I've got a coffee mug for you. When are we going to reschedule lunch.

Posted by: johngalt at February 24, 2004 07:47 PM

Did you ever think that I was wavering? I may whine a little, but I am a reliable R vote -- especially this year. The War is too important.

Lunch -- hey, our British brothers at Samizdata have an annual Bloggers Bash (I was invited one year when I was in the UK and was sad I could not make it). What if Dagny, Riza, Silence, you and I all went out to lunch? Fun? Bloodshed?

Wonder if AlexC ever gets this way between Philly and Alaska...?

Posted by: jk at February 25, 2004 10:37 AM

Sounds good. I'm thinking a far corner table and finger foods so no sharp utensils.

Posted by: Silence Dogood at February 25, 2004 04:48 PM

Well... yeah, I thought you were wavering when you wrote "Why JK is Giving Up" http://www.berkeleysquarejazz.com/blog/archives/000613.html. Not that I believed you felt there was someone better, but that your support was waning.

I'm up for a group outing but I think Dagny will be unavailable until April. Let's set something up later.

Posted by: johngalt at February 25, 2004 05:35 PM
| What do you think? [7]