June 24, 2004

Free Michael Moore

J "Voltaire" K may disagree with Michael Moore but I will defend his right to publish and advertise his filthy lies in the public square.

The FEC is not so sure. See, Farenheit 911 doesn't really jibe with the intricacies of McCain Feingold. John Fund in the OpinionJournal's Political Diary sez:

Six members of the Federal Election Commission will meet in Washington today to decide whether it's legal for Michael Moore to advertise his Bush-bashing "Fahrenheit 9/11" film on TV or radio without breaking federal law.

According to an opinion by the FEC's legal counsel, the movie's producer, Lions Gate Films, should be prohibited from running ads for "Fahrenheit" after July 30 because the McCain-Feingold campaign law prohibits any corporation (with a narrow exception for the news media) from running ads that even identify a candidate for president or Congress within 30 days of a primary election and within 60 days of a general election. Because Mr. Moore has publicly said the film is designed to defeat George W. Bush, there's no way it could be construed as other than a political effort.

Congressional members who voted for McCain-Feingold's restrictions on the First Amendment were no doubt assured that broad exemptions would exist for political speech. They were wrong. The FEC counsel's opinion is quite pointed in noting that the 2003 Supreme Court opinion upholding McCain-Feingold made clear that "the media exemption was 'narrow' and drew a distinction between 'corporations that are part of the media industry' as opposed to 'other corporations that are not involved in the regular business of imparting news to the public.'" Print and broadcast companies with news divisions meet the exemption standard; documentary film companies do not.

No one knows how the FEC will deal with this hot potato at its meeting today but the fact that the proposed muzzling of Michael Moore is on the agenda at all should be cause for concern. David Broder, the Washington Post columnist who championed the McCain-Feingold campaign reform law for years, has finally admitted it is unworkable. What the legal opinion of the FEC's general counsel proves is that it's also potentially dangerous to our freedoms.

McCain-Feingold delenda est!

Posted by jk at June 24, 2004 11:54 AM
Comments

The law is the law. It may be bad law, but it law nevertheless.
McCain-Feingold seems to be cutting in the direction of the left anyway. Let them suffer a bit, they pushed the issue, let them deal with the consequences.
Then change it.

Posted by: AlexC at June 24, 2004 02:27 PM

I think a lot of the GOP support was because it was obviously deleterious for the Dems, who rely on soft money.

But it's bad law, Alex. It cuts at the heart of our freedom. So even when it chafes Michael Moore worse than his size-52 briefs, I have to call for its removal.

Lastly, it puts the money into 527s like MoveOn.org and George Soros's outfit -- which I trust less than the DNC. It's no winner for Republicans.

Posted by: jk at June 24, 2004 02:38 PM

I dont despute it's bad law. Especially with the 527 loop-hole. The whole John Kerry nomination-acceptance-delay-trial-balloon was a result of it.
I relish the fact that the Michael Moore hit-piece might be hit by it.
Tasty.

Posted by: AlexC at June 24, 2004 03:36 PM

2227 You can buy viagra from this site :http://www.ed.greatnow.com

Posted by: Viagra at August 8, 2004 03:04 AM

Nice blog.Pleas visit my website: http://www.polyphone.us and http://www.upsms.de polyphone Klingeltöne

Posted by: polyphone at August 20, 2004 01:07 PM
| What do you think? [5]