October 13, 2004

Economic Stats

We do know how to have fun around here -- let's look at some economic statistics!

Larry Kudlow has a guest editorial in the Wall Street Journal today. He thinks that the President should be running on the good economy. The co-host of the best show on TV points out:

• Inflation-adjusted consumer spending is up 3.6%.

• Residential housing investment is up 13.2%.

• Capital-goods investment by businesses is up 13.9%.

• Spending on machine tools for heavy-industry manufacturing is up a whopping 54.2%.

• Exports and imports are up nearly 11%.

• After-tax corporate profits are up 19.5%.

• Industrial production is up 5.2%.

• High-tech production is up 23.7%.

• Productivity has reached an astonishing 4.6% rate.

• Household wealth is up 11.1%, hitting a record high of $45.9 trillion.

• The GDP deflator is up only 2.2%.

• The core consumer-spending deflator (excluding food and energy) is up only 1.4%.

• Interest rates are at 45-year lows, with short-term rates at less than 2%.

• 15-year mortgage rates are just above 5%.

• Home ownership stands at a record 69.2%.

Senator Kerry has been successful pointing to a weaker than anticipated jobs growth number in the payroll survey, but that misses all the start-ups, eBay-ers, and private contractors.
Team Kerry has flogged George W. Bush with the fact that payrolls have fallen (by 585,000) since the beginning of the president's term. Kerryites talk of a "Hoover" economy, even though two million payroll jobs have been recovered in the past 13 months.

In his own defense, Mr. Bush should highlight the household survey (the number of people actually working), which shows that 1.69 million more are employed today than when he took office. An additional 3.4 million have gone to work since the end of the recession, with 140 million Americans currently employed -- a new record. With all these new job entrants, the unemployment rate has dropped to 5.4%. This is no Hoover economy. But to make this point, Mr. Bush must use numbers on GDP and household employment. He must also stress personal income -- the best gauge of family spending power -- which is growing at a 5% pace.

[...]

Punishing successful earners and investors, as Mr. Kerry would do, is no way to grow an economy. Tax hikes on dividends and capital gains are nothing but tax hikes on the whole stock market and the 50% of households that own shares. And what good will it do to set up tax barriers for those who wish to climb the ladder to $200,000 salaries ($146,000 for single earners)? Mr. Kerry may say he likes jobs, but he doesn't seem to like the businesses that create them. By taxing capital investment more, business financing will shrink, as will the jobs that businesses create. (Who's the Hoover candidate now?) Mr. Bush will find that a few well-placed facts will go a long way in tonight's debate.


Posted by jk at October 13, 2004 10:40 AM
Comments

Well then, it must be about time for a Democrat to get elected and take credit for all this good news! (Let's hope that deceitful cycle gets broken this time.)

Posted by: johngalt at October 13, 2004 01:14 PM

Just my natural suspicion of statistics, these are up from what or when?

Posted by: Silence Dogood at October 14, 2004 10:34 AM

I know, Silence, by your count the GDP deflator is really up 2.4%...

I will confess that Mr. Kudlow does not provide source information to these but I am comfortable posting them because this is exactly what Mr. Kudlow does -- he is not dabbling in statistics to promote his politics, he is an economist and analyst.

He is also a partisan Republican and a hopeless optimist. I won't say that he would not choose the stats that buttress his argument, but I would trust the probity of the stats that he does spout.

Posted by: jk at October 14, 2004 11:38 AM

My analysis puts it at just over 2.378%... No, I am not questioning the veracity of the numbers, but they are all gains, so what is the baseline that the gains are based upon? When you are waist deep in mud that used to be up to your neck that is a rather nice improvement.

Posted by: Silence Dogood at October 14, 2004 01:26 PM

Got it. The text says "over the past year"

The best is in the intro paragraph: "Since the supply-side tax cuts were passed in Spring 2003, real economic growth has jumped to 4.8%, putting it at the head of the class of the past 20 years."

Change in GDP is all that counts to me, the rest of them will follow (although "velocity of the M1 money supply" is a great ice-breaker at parties -- I have picked up many supermodels with that line I can tell you...)

Posted by: jk at October 14, 2004 02:31 PM

Ah, over the past year, as in comparison to a year ago when tech bubble still had the market very depressed, accounting scandals were coming out weekly and jitters over the war in Iraq had us at an ecomonic low point. As I said, the mud is only waist deep now. Sorry, but I really hate this type of statistics crap. It wouldn't be any more fair to compare the numbers to the height of the tech boom under Clinton, as Sen. Kerry does regularly.

Posted by: Silence Dogood at October 15, 2004 10:29 AM

A year ago when the tax cuts were passed and began to take effect. Larry is first and foremost a supply-sider.

I don't think he is cherry-picking the dates as badly as Sentaor Kerry. The post tax cut time is significant if we are being asked to elect a man who wants to roll them back.

Senator Kerry, conversely, goes back to inauguration day to make his dire, "sky-is-falling" stats work as intended, including 9/11, business scandals and both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

Posted by: jk at October 15, 2004 11:34 AM
| What do you think? [7]