Glenn Reynolds writes a guest ed by that name in the Wall Street Journal today. (Paid site -- you gotta subscribe!) That's notable in itself, a leading figure in the blog community is writing for a leading MSM publication, if on the renegade and new-media-friendly Editorial Page.
Glenn gets the chance to push the most awesome undercurrent that the blogosphere has ever pondered: replacing Kofi Annan with former Czech President Vaclav Havel. It’s outrageous to think of a towering leader of peace and freedom at the helm of the U.N. But why?
Reynolds starts by enumerating the present Annan/UN scandals and failures:
But however you assess Mr. Havel's chances of becoming secretary general, for Mr. Annan the comparison is devastating. Mr. Havel, after all, is a hero on behalf of freedom: A man who helped bring about the end of communist dominance in Eastern Europe, despite imprisonment and the threat of death -- a man who could write that "Evil must be confronted in its womb and, if it can't be done otherwise, then it has to be dealt with by the use of force." Mr. Annan, by contrast, is a trimmer and temporizer who has stood up for tyrants far more than he has stood up to them.If the comparison is damning to Kofi, it's even more damning to the U.N. Mr. Havel once wrote Czech dictator Gustav Husak, "So far, you . . . have chosen . . . the path of inner decay for the sake of outward appearances . . . of deepening the spiritual and moral crisis of our society, and ceaselessly degrading human dignity, for the puny sake of protecting your own power." One might say the same of the U.N. bureaucracy.